🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."